Apple recently released their 2010 Supplier Responsibility Progress Report, which had some interesting findings. Along with the usual talk about Apple's dedication to workers rights, improving supplier management systems, and educating/protecting foreign contract workers, a final note was made about some rather troubling findings at some of Apples manufacturers.
According to the report, Apple has separated the violations to their fair labor contract into two categories, core and frequent violations. Core violations as Apple has put it are "the most serious class of violation. It refers to any practice or situation that we consider to be contrary to the core principles underlying Apple’s Supplier Code of Conduct—and to require immediate corrective." Recruitment fee overcharges, underage workers, improper disposal of hazardous waste, and falsification of records all fall under this category. Frequent violations are seen as the incorrect implementation of Apple's Supplier Code of Conduct over many of their manufacturers facilities.
Apple's Supplier Code of Conduct "sets a maximum of 60 work hours per week and requires at least one day of rest per seven days of work, while allowing exceptions in unusual or emergency circumstances." According to the findings in the progress report Apple has discovered that 60 of their manufacturers have been exceeding the 60 hours a week 50% of the time. Also, the report stated that at 65 facilities more than half had records of workers working more than six consecutive days.
The report also mentions having found several cases where wages, compensation, and benefits were all being withheld improperly according to the Apple Supplier Code of Conduct. At 48 facilities Apple found that overtime wages were being improperly calculated and recorded, resulting in the workers not being paid for their labor. In another instance, Apple discovered 24 facilities had wages below the minimum wage set by Apple's code. The report also detailed the finding of many cases where legally required benefits were being withheld; this was found at 57 facilities.
I think it is important to note two things. The first is that in many of these cases Apple is imposing their own regulations, which are often far more strict than those of the local government. In the case of workers being paid below the minimum wage, this is Apples minimum wage, not that this justifies the underpayment but simply for perspective on the situation. The second thing to take note of is that this Supplier Code of Conduct is not legally required of Apple. Many of the local governmental regulations and requirements of Apple's facilities are far below what Apple expects from them.
Finally, although Apple recognizes and offers solutions to these violations they do not give much detail as to how their solutions are implemented or the success in the past. Many of their solutions read as follows, "To address these issues, we required each facility to develop management systems—or improve existing systems—to drive compliance with Apple’s limits on work hours and required days of rest." In my opinion this is a way for Apple to cop out and put all the responsibility on the manufacturer. For example, in the solution they require the facility to develop their own management system to solve the issue. This seems problematic because, as in many cases, the manufacturers will often revert back to their local standards as soon as the audit it over.
I have only touched on a few issues brought up in Apple's 2010 Supplier Responsibility Progress Report. If you you would like read more,
do so by following this link to Apple's 2010 Supplier Responsibility Progress Report.
